What I hadn't learned yet - and still sometimes struggle with in my personal life - is that it's vitally important that we remember to measure harm based on our own perceptions, rather than those of someone else. There's a difference between something being painful vs. something being harmful.
A family is in my office because something is not working in their life and that means that sometimes I am required to bring that to their attention in ways that feel "harmful" (though really they're just painful) to them. If there's an alcoholic family in my office and I fail to model good boundaries by confronting offensive behavior (in a respectful, but firm fashion), fail in speaking the truth as I see it (in a respectful, but firm fashion) of fail in modeling boundaries about the behavior I will and will not accept in the future, I am doing harm to the family members of the addict. This behavior will be perceived as harmful by someone who is still pre-contemplative.
Disillusion is at the root of almost all pain - pain is what happens when perception and reality clash. A successful therapist brings truth to their clients (which is often intensely painful) in a loving way and at at time when they're able to accept it.
So that's the first thought I have on doing no harm. The second is to realize that at some point in your career (probably daily at first) you're going to make the wrong decision. I encourage folks to realize that Doing No Harm in this profession is an aspirational (rather than practical) ethical goal. I've adopted a "do not harm on purpose" philosophy and I make sure I apologize if I realize I did harm.
These two things are valuable tools when it comes to abrogating the fear of doing harm.
No comments:
Post a Comment